来自用户 半面阳光 的文献。
当前共找到 29 篇文献分享,本页显示第 21 - 29 篇。
21.
半面阳光 (2023-03-31 19:02):
#paper DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.12.006, Am J Hum Genet. 2013, Noninvasive detection of fetal subchromosome abnormalities via deep sequencing of maternal plasma. 基于NGS的NIPT检测染色体非整倍体技术建立之后,进一步的研究重点和热点之一是将NIPT从检测染色体非整倍体拓展到检测染色体上的微缺失微重复片段。这篇文献可能是首次系统性建立用于检测微缺失和微重复的NIPT方法学文章。
Abstract:
The purpose of this study was to determine the deep sequencing and analytic conditions needed to detect fetal subchromosome abnormalities across the genome from a maternal blood sample. Cell-free (cf) … >>>
The purpose of this study was to determine the deep sequencing and analytic conditions needed to detect fetal subchromosome abnormalities across the genome from a maternal blood sample. Cell-free (cf) DNA was isolated from the plasma of 11 pregnant women carrying fetuses with subchromosomal duplications and deletions, translocations, mosaicism, and trisomy 20 diagnosed by metaphase karyotype. Massively parallel sequencing (MPS) was performed with 25-mer tags at approximately 10(9) tags per sample and mapped to reference human genome assembly hg19. Tags were counted and normalized to fixed genome bin sizes of 1 Mb or 100 kb to detect statistically distinct copy-number changes compared to the reference. All seven cases of microdeletions, duplications, translocations, and the trisomy 20 were detected blindly by MPS, including a microdeletion as small as 300 kb. In two of these cases in which the metaphase karyotype showed additional material of unknown origin, MPS identified both the translocation breakpoint and the chromosomal origin of the additional material. In the four mosaic cases, the subchromosomal abnormality was not demonstrated by MPS. This work shows that in nonmosaic cases, it is possible to obtain a fetal molecular karyotype by MPS of maternal plasma cfDNA that is equivalent to a chromosome microarray and in some cases is better than a metaphase karyotype. This approach combines the advantage of enhanced fetal genomic resolution with the improved safety of a noninvasive maternal blood test. <<<
翻译
22.
半面阳光 (2023-02-28 14:45):
#paper https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2022.11.004 Genetics in Medicine, 2023, Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) for fetal chromosome abnormalities in a general-risk population: An evidence-based clinical guideline of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). ACMG在2022年12月发表了最新版的NIPT应用指南。这个版本的指南是对2016版指南的更新。这次更新过程中,ACMG的NIPS专项小组采用系统性综述和GRADE“证据到决策”框架等分析评估方法,对NIPS用于一般风险人群的各项参数进行了评估,形成了6条主要应用性建议。相较于传统的筛查方法,NIPS在21、18和13三体的筛查性检测中,无论单胎妊娠还是双胎妊娠,都展现了其优越性。ACMG给出明确意见,建议一般风险人群采用NIPS进行21、18和13三体的筛查,以替代传统筛查手段。同时明确指出,建议使用NIPS来筛查胎儿性染色体非整倍体异常。除了这几条给出“强烈建议”的意见之外,指南还对NIPS用于小片段缺失以及其他类型CNVs的检测给出了指导性建议。
Abstract:
PURPOSE: This workgroup aimed to develop an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the use of noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) for pregnant individuals at general risk for fetal trisomy 21, trisomy … >>>
PURPOSE: This workgroup aimed to develop an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the use of noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) for pregnant individuals at general risk for fetal trisomy 21, trisomy 18, or trisomy 13 and to evaluate the utility of NIPS for other chromosomal disorders.METHODS: The NIPS Evidence-Based Guideline Work Group (n = 7) relied on the results from the recent American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) systematic review to form the evidentiary basis of this guideline. Workgroup members used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Evidence to Decision framework to draft recommendations. The guideline underwent extensive internal and external peer review with a public comment period before approval by the ACMG Board of Directors.RESULTS: Evidence consistently demonstrated improved accuracy of NIPS compared with traditional screening methods for trisomies 21, 18, and 13 in singleton and twin gestations. Identification of rare autosomal trisomies and other microdeletion syndromes with NIPS is an emerging area of interest.CONCLUSION: ACMG strongly recommends NIPS over traditional screening methods for all pregnant patients with singleton and twin gestations for fetal trisomies 21, 18, and 13 and strongly recommends NIPS be offered to patients to screen for fetal sex chromosome aneuploidy. <<<
翻译
23.
半面阳光 (2023-01-31 23:38):
#paper doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2015.03.004. Pediatr Clin North Am, 2015, Prader-Willi, Angelman, and 15q11-q13 Duplication Syndromes, 15号染色体区段15q11-q13上的缺失或者重复会导致三种综合征,Prader-Willi 综合征, Angelman 综合征和 15q11-q13 duplication 综合征。这篇综述文章总结了这三种综合征的临床背景信息、遗传机制、诊断策略以及治疗方案。通过这篇文章能够清楚地了解这三种综合征之间的异同。
Abstract:
Three distinct neurodevelopmental disorders arise primarily from deletions or duplications that occur at the 15q11-q13 locus: Prader-Willi syndrome, Angelman syndrome, and 15q11-q13 duplication syndrome. Each of these disorders results from … >>>
Three distinct neurodevelopmental disorders arise primarily from deletions or duplications that occur at the 15q11-q13 locus: Prader-Willi syndrome, Angelman syndrome, and 15q11-q13 duplication syndrome. Each of these disorders results from the loss of function or overexpression of at least 1 imprinted gene. This article discusses the clinical background, genetic cause, diagnostic strategy, and management of each of these 3 disorders. <<<
翻译
24.
半面阳光 (2022-12-31 22:55):
#paper doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3182217a3a, Genetics in Medicine, 2011, American College of Medical Genetics standards and guidelines for interpretation and reporting of postnatal constitutional copy number variants. 临床CNV变异解读的早期指南。这篇指南是目前广泛使用的2019版CNV解读指南的“前传”。这个版本的指南中清晰地界定了进行临床解读的CNV的定义和范围,并且提出了在解读时,要区分CNV的“致病性”和“临床意义”(也就是表型的对应和关联)这两个维度的信息。虽然在将近10年后的2019年发布了将CNV致病性解读进行半定量评分的重大更新,但是这篇指南的意义同样重要,对临床场景的CNV解读的流程、信息证据的搜集整理评估、报告的撰写发布、技术平台的局限性等等关键问题都进行了清晰地讨论和分析,是一篇承上启下的指南。
Abstract:
Genomic microarrays used to assess DNA copy number are now recommended as first-tier tests for the postnatal evaluation of individuals with intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorders, and/or multiple congenital anomalies. … >>>
Genomic microarrays used to assess DNA copy number are now recommended as first-tier tests for the postnatal evaluation of individuals with intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorders, and/or multiple congenital anomalies. Application of this technology has resulted in the discovery of widespread copy number variation in the human genome, both polymorphic variation in healthy individuals and novel pathogenic copy number imbalances. To assist clinical laboratories in the evaluation of copy number variants and to promote consistency in interpretation and reporting of genomic microarray results, the American College of Medical Genetics has developed the following professional guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of copy number variation. These guidelines apply primarily to evaluation of constitutional copy number variants detected in the postnatal setting. <<<
翻译
25.
半面阳光 (2022-11-12 18:32):
#paper DOI: 10.1126/science.35.896.340 Science, 1912, First use of word “genotype”. 这篇文章1921年3月1日发表在Science杂志,是一篇Letter,作者Henry Fairfield Osborn。文章非常短,只有几百字。主要内容是讨论“genotype”这个词的使用起源。作者向当时的一位权威命名学和分类学家Dr Joel Asaph Allen询问“genotype”这个词首次被使用的情形。Dr Joel Asaph Allen回复说他认为genotype这个词最早使用是在1903年,并且在1910年之前获得了国际动物学委员会(International Zoological Commission)官方认可,最早应该是被Nature或Annals and magazine of Natural History杂志的作者所用。Genotype词源于希腊语的两个词,语义是“kind, genus” 和“type”。这个合成词中间用“O”这个元音进行连接。但是作者提出为什么没有像genetic和genesis一样用元音“E”来连接呢?作者提出理清“genotype”一词的使用问题,可以避免后续使用中可能出现的混淆情况。这篇Letter类似“社交媒体”类的分享,感觉很像1900年代的朋友圈。因为本文的信息量太少,原文中有些内容读起来有点一头雾水。根据文章提到的一些人和概念,去回溯了几篇文章,发现当时对“Genotype”这个词的使用似乎很有争议,类似于引发了一波当时的“骂战”。1921年3月29日的Science杂志的Letter版块,又有一篇名为The use of the word “genotype”的文章,讨论学术界对这个词使用中的不同意见。另外,这个词还引出了一个对遗传学发展有重要影响的人Wilhelm Ludvig Johannsen,他被认为是Gene、Genotype、Phenotype这些概念的创造者,以及遗传学科的奠基人之一。在双螺旋结构发现之前,遗传学领域的发展和历史应该很热闹,只是课本以及平时工作研究所看的文献中,很少有机会读到这种更偏向于生物学历史研究的文章。另外,这个作者Henry Fairfield Osborn除了是一个著名的古生物学者,担任美国自然历史博物馆馆长达25年,还是个富二代,他的父亲是当时著名的铁路大亨William Henry Osborn。
IF:44.700Q1 Science, 2006. DOI: 10.1126/science.35.896.340
Abstract: No abstract available.
26.
半面阳光 (2022-10-31 19:53):
#paper DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0686-8, 2019, Technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen). 这篇文献是ACMG和ClinGen发布的关于临床上拷贝数变异(CNVs)检测结果解读的指南。过去十几年中染色体芯片chromosomal microarray(CMA)技术已被广泛用于拷贝数变异检测,近年来基于二代测序(NGS)的CNV-Seq技术也被越来越广泛地应用于临床染色体拷贝数变异检测中。大部分检出的CNVs是独特的,需要进一步对其致病性进行评估。准确地进行临床CNVs致病性解读至关重要,并且需要一个标准化的解读方法和流程,来确保不同实验室之间解读的一致性。这篇指南首先确定了可用于对CNVs进行分类的证据类型,包括:基因组成分、剂量敏感性预测和梳理、预测功能效应、与临床文献报道病例的重叠与否、病例与对照数据库证据、以及个体CNVs的遗传模式。接着对这些不同类型的证据分配的不同的权重,最后形成了一个半定量的计分系统。这篇指南对这个评分系统的形成过程、各个记分点的说明、记分系统的使用、以及应用举例进行了详细的阐释。这一指南是目前国内外进行CNVs解读的主要参考文献。读这篇文章的体会有二,一是信息量极大,需要反复详细阅读;二是需要配合案例实际操作,才能充分理解。
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Copy-number analysis to detect disease-causing losses and gains across the genome is recommended for the evaluation of individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders and/or multiple congenital anomalies, as well as for … >>>
PURPOSE: Copy-number analysis to detect disease-causing losses and gains across the genome is recommended for the evaluation of individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders and/or multiple congenital anomalies, as well as for fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities. In the decade that this analysis has been in widespread clinical use, tremendous strides have been made in understanding the effects of copy-number variants (CNVs) in both affected individuals and the general population. However, continued broad implementation of array and next-generation sequencing-based technologies will expand the types of CNVs encountered in the clinical setting, as well as our understanding of their impact on human health.METHODS: To assist clinical laboratories in the classification and reporting of CNVs, irrespective of the technology used to identify them, the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics has developed the following professional standards in collaboration with the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) project.RESULTS: This update introduces a quantitative, evidence-based scoring framework; encourages the implementation of the five-tier classification system widely used in sequence variant classification; and recommends "uncoupling" the evidence-based classification of a variant from its potential implications for a particular individual.CONCLUSION: These professional standards will guide the evaluation of constitutional CNVs and encourage consistency and transparency across clinical laboratories. <<<
翻译
27.
半面阳光 (2022-09-30 20:30):
#paper DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2022.05.011 Detection and characterization of male sex chromosome abnormalities in the UK Biobank study. 这篇文章发表在2022年9月的Genetics in Medicine,可以概括为一篇综合分析类的文章。 作者以UK Biobank数据库中的20万欧洲血统的男性的基因检测(SNV芯片)数据和健康记录作为数据来源,系统性地分析研究了两种常见的男性性染色体异常(47,XXY和47,XYY)以及这两种性染色体异常所关联的疾病风险。 这篇研究的一个主要切入点是以往研究中存在的样本采集偏差(sampling bias)。47,XXY(即Klinefelter综合征简称(KS))的特征和相关风险疾病报道较多,而相比较之下,47,XYY的特征和相关联的疾病则没有较为系统的归纳,主要原因是很多XYY的人没有到临床机构就诊,进而无从得知自己的基因型。这些性染色体异常表型特征报道受到样本采集偏差(sampling bias)的影响,就导致我们无法全面地了解此类染色体异常相关的临床特征。 一个尽量减小样本采集偏差研究方法是基于大规模人群进行系统性评估分析。本研究就采样了这一方法来研究这两种性染色体异常的发病率和疾病表型特征。作者首先根据UK Biobank数据库中的基因检测数据筛选出213例XXY和143例XYY,得到了成年男性性染色体异常的发病率数据,同时发现这些病例大部分未能在常规临床中检出。对这些性染色体异常人群的医疗健康记录进一步研究还发现XXY和XYY在生殖相关的表型上有明显差异,但是两者在其他相关疾病风险上却表现出惊人一致,比如2型糖尿病、肺栓塞和动脉硬化等,但是对这种现象目前还没有比较明确的解释。最后作者提到,在未来的研究中,如果针对某种疾病风险(如血栓风险)进行基因检测时,可以考虑同时将性染色体异常的评估纳入进来。
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The study aimed to systematically ascertain male sex chromosome abnormalities, 47,XXY (Klinefelter syndrome [KS]) and 47,XYY, and characterize their risks of adverse health outcomes.METHODS: We analyzed genotyping array or … >>>
PURPOSE: The study aimed to systematically ascertain male sex chromosome abnormalities, 47,XXY (Klinefelter syndrome [KS]) and 47,XYY, and characterize their risks of adverse health outcomes.METHODS: We analyzed genotyping array or exome sequence data in 207,067 men of European ancestry aged 40 to 70 years from the UK Biobank and related these to extensive routine health record data.RESULTS: Only 49 of 213 (23%) of men whom we identified with KS and only 1 of 143 (0.7%) with 47,XYY had a diagnosis of abnormal karyotype on their medical records or self-report. We observed expected associations for KS with reproductive dysfunction (late puberty: risk ratio [RR] = 2.7; childlessness: RR = 4.2; testosterone concentration: RR = -3.8 nmol/L, all P < 2 × 10-8), whereas XYY men appeared to have normal reproductive function. Despite this difference, we identified several higher disease risks shared across both KS and 47,XYY, including type 2 diabetes (RR = 3.0 and 2.6, respectively), venous thrombosis (RR = 6.4 and 7.4, respectively), pulmonary embolism (RR = 3.3 and 3.7, respectively), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (RR = 4.4 and 4.6, respectively) (all P < 7 × 10-6).CONCLUSION: KS and 47,XYY were mostly unrecognized but conferred substantially higher risks for metabolic, vascular, and respiratory diseases, which were only partially explained by higher levels of body mass index, deprivation, and smoking. <<<
翻译
28.
半面阳光 (2022-08-31 21:17):
#paper https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2022.04.021. Recommendations for next generation sequencing data reanalysis of unsolved cases with suspected Mendelian disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. 这篇文章发表在2022年8月的Genetics in Medicine上,是一篇系统综述。基于NGS的临床全外显子组(WES)和临床全基因组(WGS)测序给孟德尔遗传病的诊断带来了很多进展,但是有超过50%的病例无法从测序结果中得到明确的致病原因。周期性地对这些没有明确结论的测序数据进行重新分析有助于进一步确定致病变异。那么重新分析的患者获益有多少、临床应用的可行性有多大,还有在初次测序后多长时间进行重新分析,以及选择什么方法和工具进行分析都是尚待探究讨论的问题。这篇文章意图分析和解答这些问题。作者采用了meta分析的方法首先对2007年到2021年发表的相关文献进行了检索和初步筛选。接着针对文章的主题,设计了一个文献筛选标准,最终筛选得到29篇研究性文献,包含了9419个未确诊的孟德尔遗传病患者。研究发现,重新分析的整体诊断产出为0.10(95% CI = 0.06-0.13)。大部分诊断结果的更新取决于遗传变异的新文献报道。重新分析得到确诊结果在初次检测的24个月后比较多,但是这个数据并没有统计意义。基于AI的一些新分析工具对于提高重新分析的诊断率并没有显著的价值。此外,对测序数据进行重新分析的研究文章有很大的差异性,这也使得本文的一些关键问题无法得出有意义的结论,作者最后也提出希望可以有标准化指南来指导后续的重新分析研究。除了研究结果和结论本身,这篇文章另一个值得借鉴的内容是其研究方法。在研究方法部分作者参考了很多筛选文献、评估研究数据的标准化方法和指南,这对于我们平时管理文献和数据、从文献中提取关键信息、对变异进行biocuration都很有帮助。作为ACMG的官方期刊,Genetics in Medicine最近发表了不少这方面的综述性文章,以及AI与临床NGS数据分析结合的文章。
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The study aimed to determine the diagnostic yield, optimal timing, and methodology of next generation sequencing data reanalysis in suspected Mendelian disorders.METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis … >>>
PURPOSE: The study aimed to determine the diagnostic yield, optimal timing, and methodology of next generation sequencing data reanalysis in suspected Mendelian disorders.METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that conducted data reanalysis in patients with suspected Mendelian disorders. Random effects model was used to pool the estimated outcome with subgroup analysis stratified by timing, sequencing methodology, sample size, segregation, use of research validation, and artificial intelligence (AI) variant curation tools.RESULTS: A search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science between 2007 and 2021 yielded 9327 articles, of which 29 were selected. Significant heterogeneity was noted between studies. Reanalysis had an overall diagnostic yield of 0.10 (95% CI = 0.06-0.13). Literature updates accounted for most new diagnoses. Diagnostic yield was higher after 24 months, although this was not statistically significant. Increased diagnoses were obtained with research validation and data sharing. AI-based tools did not adversely affect reanalysis diagnostic rate.CONCLUSION: Next generation sequencing data reanalysis can improve diagnostic yield. Owing to the heterogeneity of the studies, the optimal time to reanalysis and the impact of AI-based tools could not be determined with confidence. We propose standardized guidelines for future studies to reduce heterogeneity and improve the quality of the conclusions. <<<
翻译
29.
半面阳光 (2022-07-26 14:25):
#paper DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2019768118, 2021 Feb 2;118(5):e2019768118. Genome-wide detection of cytosine methylation by single molecule real-time sequencing. 这篇文章并非一篇最新发表的文献,是香港中文大学卢煜明团队于2021年发表在PANS上一篇研究文献。因为近期在一个学术会议上听到卢煜明教授介绍了这篇文献有关的研究结果,因此拿来研读。这篇文章的核心内容是利用PacBio的SMRT三代测序技术和卷积神经网络来检测DNA的甲基化。胞嘧啶的甲基化修饰,5-Methylcytosine (5mC) 是表观修饰中最重要的一种类型。应用比较广泛的检测CpG测序方法是亚硫酸盐测序(BS-seq)。但是BS-seq有一些不足之处,比如亚硫酸盐会导致DNA降解、还会将DNA序列中非甲基化的胞嘧啶(C)转化为胸腺嘧啶(T),影响后续的比对;而原始序列中C->T的点突变则又无法被亚硫酸盐所修饰。因此,在这篇文献中,作者采用单分子实时测序(Single molecular rea-time sequencing, SMRT sequencing)技术,开发了一个直接检测5mC的方法。这个方法将SMRT测序中的两个关键信息作为输入数据,结合卷积神经网络(CNN)构建了一个称为Holistic Kinetic (HK)Model 的检测方法。关键输入数据包括两个:一是SMRT测序中DNA聚合酶的动态信号(包括单个碱基发出荧光信号的时间和两个连续碱基之间的间隔时间),二是“序列背景”信息,即待检测的一段固定长度的DNA序列信息,这段固定长度的序列被称为一个“检测窗口”。作者首先用全基因组扩增的方法构建了一个非甲基化的数据集(阴性数据集,所有序列几乎都没有甲基化),同时用M.SssI 转甲基酶处理DNA样本构建了一个甲基化(阳性数据集, M.SssI 能够对双链DNA上的所有CpG位点进行甲基化);接着从这两个数据集中各取出一半数据来训练卷积神经网络,剩下的数据用于验证HK model的检测效果。结果显示,用HK model来区分甲基化状态的AUC最高达到了0.97。全基因组范围内在单碱基分辨率水平上检测5mC的敏感性和特异性分别达到90%和94%。研究结果还发现通过调节检测窗口大小和测序深度能够改变HK模型的检测效果。为了平衡下游数据分析与准确性之间的关系,最后选定21nt作为检测窗口的默认值,将10×作为测序深度的默认值。后续,作者采用一段人和小鼠杂交序列验证了HK模型在检测“杂合甲基化”序列(即同一段序列中同时包括甲基化和非甲基化的CpG )的可行性。此外,作者还对BS-seq的检测效果和HK model的检测效果进行了简单的比较研究。看这篇文献的感受一方面是工作量大,二是体现了作者对分子生物学的理论知识和测序技术特点的充分理解和应用。另外,这篇文献的整体研究框架和卢煜明团队以往的研究在思维上有着一脉相承的感觉,都体现了透彻地理解基本理论、灵活地运用测序技术来解决临床检测的难题。
Abstract:
5-Methylcytosine (5mC) is an important type of epigenetic modification. Bisulfite sequencing (BS-seq) has limitations, such as severe DNA degradation. Using single molecule real-time sequencing, we developed a methodology to directly … >>>
5-Methylcytosine (5mC) is an important type of epigenetic modification. Bisulfite sequencing (BS-seq) has limitations, such as severe DNA degradation. Using single molecule real-time sequencing, we developed a methodology to directly examine 5mC. This approach holistically examined kinetic signals of a DNA polymerase (including interpulse duration and pulse width) and sequence context for every nucleotide within a measurement window, termed the holistic kinetic (HK) model. The measurement window of each analyzed double-stranded DNA molecule comprised 21 nucleotides with a cytosine in a CpG site in the center. We used amplified DNA (unmethylated) and M.SssI-treated DNA (methylated) (M.SssI being a CpG methyltransferase) to train a convolutional neural network. The area under the curve for differentiating methylation states using such samples was up to 0.97. The sensitivity and specificity for genome-wide 5mC detection at single-base resolution reached 90% and 94%, respectively. The HK model was then tested on human-mouse hybrid fragments in which each member of the hybrid had a different methylation status. The model was also tested on human genomic DNA molecules extracted from various biological samples, such as buffy coat, placental, and tumoral tissues. The overall methylation levels deduced by the HK model were well correlated with those by BS-seq ( = 0.99; < 0.0001) and allowed the measurement of allele-specific methylation patterns in imprinted genes. Taken together, this methodology has provided a system for simultaneous genome-wide genetic and epigenetic analyses. <<<
翻译
回到顶部