来自杂志 Child development 的文献。
当前共找到 2 篇文献分享。
1.
钟鸣 (2024-03-31 00:55):
#paper doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01164.x Social and Cognitive Correlates of Children’s Lying Behavior 命令孩子在独处时不要触碰玩具,他能否做到?又是否会承认?这是研究儿童说谎的常用办法。约四成的3岁儿童会说谎,这一比例在5-7岁儿童中更高。相应的,3岁儿童的圆谎能力(语义泄漏控制)很弱,但一半的六七岁的儿童已经发展了这个能力。此外,儿童圆谎能力越弱,表明其抑制控制盒工作记忆越差,而儿童对说谎的道德概念比较弱,但是道德认识越强的儿童说谎的概率越低。
IF:3.900Q1 Child development, 2008 Jul-Aug. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01164.x PMID: 18717895
Abstract:
The relation between children's lie-telling and their social and cognitive development was examined. Children (3-8 years) were told not to peek at a toy. Most children peeked and later lied … >>>
The relation between children's lie-telling and their social and cognitive development was examined. Children (3-8 years) were told not to peek at a toy. Most children peeked and later lied about peeking. Children's subsequent verbal statements were not always consistent with their initial denial and leaked critical information revealing their deceit. Children's conceptual moral understanding of lies, executive functioning, and theory-of-mind understanding were also assessed. Children's initial false denials were related to their first-order belief understanding and their inhibitory control. Children's ability to maintain their lies was related to their second-order belief understanding. Children's lying was related to their moral evaluations. These findings suggest that social and cognitive factors may play an important role in children's lie-telling abilities. <<<
翻译
2.
魏魏魏 (2022-10-31 22:51):
#paper doi:10.1111/cdev.13002 Child Development, (2017), Adolescent Perceptions of Parental Privacy Invasion and Adolescent Secrecy: An Illustration of Simpson’s Paradox. 该研究探讨了父母对子女隐私的侵犯与青少年子女隐私之间的关系,这属于亲子关系的深入探讨,而且是对青少年群体的研究。青少年的隐私与被视为隐私侵犯的父母行为之间的关系是复杂的,该研究试图通过交叉滞后研究探讨两个变量之间的因果关系。在当前研究中,青少年前后三次报告了感知到的父母隐私侵犯行为和隐私的情况。结果发现,隐私侵犯行为正向预测子女的保密行为,这一关系反过来也是成立的。控制了正向的群体水平上的相关这个混淆变量的影响后,个体水平上的相关呈现出负相关关系。再个体水平上,较高保密行为预测了较低的隐私侵犯行为。这一结果与人们的常识或朴素的感觉是冲突的,因此,相关研究应该深入进行。
IF:3.900Q1 Child development, 2018-11. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.13002 PMID: 29178282
Abstract:
Adolescents' secrecy is intertwined with perception of parents' behaviors as acts of privacy invasion. It is currently untested, however, how this transactional process operates at the within-person level-where these causal … >>>
Adolescents' secrecy is intertwined with perception of parents' behaviors as acts of privacy invasion. It is currently untested, however, how this transactional process operates at the within-person level-where these causal processes take place. Dutch adolescents (n = 244, M = 13.84, 38.50% boys) reported three times on perceived parental privacy invasion and secrecy. Cross-lagged panel models (CLPM) confirmed earlier findings. Privacy invasion predicted increased secrecy, but a reverse effect was found from increased secrecy to increased privacy invasion. Controlling for confounding positive group-level associations with a novel random intercept CLPM, negative within-person associations were found. Higher levels of secrecy predicted lower levels of privacy invasive behaviors at the within-person level. These opposing findings within- versus between-persons illustrate a Simpson's paradox. <<<
翻译
回到顶部