魏魏魏 (2022-10-31 22:51):
#paper doi:10.1111/cdev.13002 Child Development, (2017), Adolescent Perceptions of Parental Privacy Invasion and Adolescent Secrecy: An Illustration of Simpson’s Paradox. 该研究探讨了父母对子女隐私的侵犯与青少年子女隐私之间的关系,这属于亲子关系的深入探讨,而且是对青少年群体的研究。青少年的隐私与被视为隐私侵犯的父母行为之间的关系是复杂的,该研究试图通过交叉滞后研究探讨两个变量之间的因果关系。在当前研究中,青少年前后三次报告了感知到的父母隐私侵犯行为和隐私的情况。结果发现,隐私侵犯行为正向预测子女的保密行为,这一关系反过来也是成立的。控制了正向的群体水平上的相关这个混淆变量的影响后,个体水平上的相关呈现出负相关关系。再个体水平上,较高保密行为预测了较低的隐私侵犯行为。这一结果与人们的常识或朴素的感觉是冲突的,因此,相关研究应该深入进行。
IF:3.900Q1 Child development, 2018-11. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.13002 PMID: 29178282
Adolescent Perceptions of Parental Privacy Invasion and Adolescent Secrecy: An Illustration of Simpson's Paradox
翻译
Abstract:
Adolescents' secrecy is intertwined with perception of parents' behaviors as acts of privacy invasion. It is currently untested, however, how this transactional process operates at the within-person level-where these causal processes take place. Dutch adolescents (n = 244, M = 13.84, 38.50% boys) reported three times on perceived parental privacy invasion and secrecy. Cross-lagged panel models (CLPM) confirmed earlier findings. Privacy invasion predicted increased secrecy, but a reverse effect was found from increased secrecy to increased privacy invasion. Controlling for confounding positive group-level associations with a novel random intercept CLPM, negative within-person associations were found. Higher levels of secrecy predicted lower levels of privacy invasive behaviors at the within-person level. These opposing findings within- versus between-persons illustrate a Simpson's paradox.
翻译
回到顶部