来自用户 ZĒNG Yíngzhū (Zoo) 曾莹珠 的文献。
当前共找到 1 篇文献分享。
1.
ZĒNG Yíngzhū (Zoo) 曾莹珠 (2025-04-30 16:49):
#paper DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adn5290 SCIENCE ADVANCES 2024 Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content Reason for recommendation: I don't want to read fear conditioning anymore and don't know what specific topic I want to study in the future. Then I chose the top journal Science and searched CREATIVITY, and found this one that is latest and not very difficult for me to read. Review: 1, Actually GenAI got popular long time ago but it got common this year, I remember after Spring Festival? I should have read this article earlier. 2, Question1: Five GenAI idea condition 的被试平均只使用了2.55次,只有24.5%的人用了5次。他实验设计的时候就是设置了这一组最多能用5次。我想问为啥不定死这个条件呀?就是规定被试必须用5次,然后再写故事。 3, Question2: for exploratory purposes的这种分析,我看它写在正文和放在补充材料。是不是也可以直接留下用于另写一篇新的呀?假如这篇文章没有这部分,会降低它被Science接收的概率吗……
Abstract:
Creativity is core to being human. Generative artificial intelligence (AI)—including powerful large language models (LLMs)—holds promise for humans to be more creative by offering new ideas, or less creative by … >>>
Creativity is core to being human. Generative artificial intelligence (AI)—including powerful large language models (LLMs)—holds promise for humans to be more creative by offering new ideas, or less creative by anchoring on generative AI ideas. We study the causal impact of generative AI ideas on the production of short stories in an online experiment where some writers obtained story ideas from an LLM. We find that access to generative AI ideas causes stories to be evaluated as more creative, better written, and more enjoyable, especially among less creative writers. However, generative AI–enabled stories are more similar to each other than stories by humans alone. These results point to an increase in individual creativity at the risk of losing collective novelty. This dynamic resembles a social dilemma: With generative AI, writers are individually better off, but collectively a narrower scope of novel content is produced. Our results have implications for researchers, policy-makers, and practitioners interested in bolstering creativity. <<<
翻译
回到顶部