薛定谔的猫
(2025-02-01 00:07):
#paper, doi:10.1001/jama.2024.24438 Pulmonary Vein Isolation With Optimized Linear Ablation
vs Pulmonary Vein Isolation Alone for Persistent AF
The PROMPT-AF Randomized Clinical Trial PROMPT-AF研究是一项研究者发起的全国多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验,旨在科学验证"改良2C3L"术式(在肺静脉隔离基础上行二尖瓣峡部线、三尖瓣峡部线、顶部线消融)相比传统治疗方案(肺静脉隔离)的优势。研究纳入来自全国12家中心共498例首次消融的持续性房颤患者。所有患者均接受为期12个月的随访,(每周一次24小时的单导联心电贴监测心律),确研究的主要终点为术后12个月(排除术后三个月空白期)、不接受抗心律失常药物治疗的情况下,无>30s的房颤、房扑、房速发生。研究结果表明,“改良2C3L”策略消融术后1年无房性心律失常复发为70.7%,显著优于肺静脉隔离组的61.5%(HR 0.73, 95%CI:0.54 – 0.99)。
JAMA,
2024-11-18.
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.24438
Pulmonary Vein Isolation With Optimized Linear Ablation vs Pulmonary Vein Isolation Alone for Persistent AF
翻译
优化线性消融的肺静脉隔离与单独肺静脉隔离治疗持续性 AF
Abstract:
ImportanceSuccess rates of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) are modest for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Additional linear ablation beyond PVI has not been proved superior to PVI alone in randomized trials. Ethanol infusion of the vein of Marshall (EIVOM) facilitates ablation at the mitral isthmus and may lead to improved effectiveness of a linear ablation strategy.ObjectiveTo determine whether linear ablation with radiofrequency energy combined with EIVOM added to PVI improves sinus rhythm maintenance compared with PVI alone in patients with persistent AF.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThe PROMPT-AF trial is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial involving 12 tertiary hospitals in China. A total of 498 patients aged 18 to 80 years, with AF persisting for more than 3 months, undergoing first-time AF ablation, were enrolled and randomized from August 27, 2021, to July 16, 2023.InterventionsPatients were randomized to undergo PVI alone or PVI plus EIVOM and linear ablation (intervention). The latter group first underwent EIVOM, followed by PVI and linear ablation of the left atrial roof, mitral isthmus, and cavotricuspid isthmus.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary end point was freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmias lasting more than 30 seconds, without the use of antiarrhythmic drugs within 12 months. Secondary outcomes included freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence, AF, atrial arrhythmia recurrence after multiple procedures, and documented atrial tachycardia or atrial flutter with or without antiarrhythmic drugs; AF burden; and improvement in quality of life. Patients were monitored with wearable single-lead electrocardiographic (ECG) patches, worn for 24 hours a week, supplemented by symptom-triggered ECGs and Holter monitoring.ResultsAmong 498 randomized patients, 495 (99.4%) were included in the primary analysis (mean age, 61.1 years [SD, 9.7] years, 361 male [72.9%]). After 12 months, 174 of 246 patients (70.7%) assigned to undergo PVI plus EIVOM and linear ablation and 153 of 249 patients (61.5%) assigned to undergo PVI alone remained free from atrial arrhythmias without taking antiarrhythmic drugs (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54-0.99, P = .045). The intervention effect was consistent across all prespecified subgroups. The comparison of secondary outcomes did not demonstrate significant results.ConclusionAmong patients with persistent AF, linear ablation combined with EIVOM in addition to PVI significantly improved freedom from atrial arrhythmias within 12 months compared with PVI alone.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04497376
翻译
Related Links: